What type of character is Juror 8 in 12 Angry Men?

What type of character is Juror 8 in 12 Angry Men?

Described as peaceful and compassionate, Juror 8 is focused on the truth of the case and refuses to give up until the other jurors face that truth. It is through his persuasive abilities that one by one, the other jurors change their initial vote from guilty to not guilty.

Which juror is the best in 12 Angry Men?

Juror #8
Juror #8. He votes “not guilty” during the jury’s first vote. Described as “thoughtful” and “gentle,” Juror #8 is usually portrayed as the most heroic member of the jury.

How is characterization in 12 Angry Men?

There are four major methods of revealing characterization: actions, appearance, dialogue, and thoughts. The film 12 Angry Men makes strong use of all of these methods, but the use of appearance seems to be the primary method used in revealing characterization.

Why is Juror 3 the antagonist?

Juror 3 is very opinionated; he is also accustomed to forcing his wishes upon others. He is the antagonist. At one point he says, At another point in Act II, as there is a secret vote without Juror 8 and one man votes guilty, Juror 3 demands to know who has changed his vote.

Why did Juror 3 change his vote?

Juror 3 changed his vote after realizing that all of his anger toward the defendant was a direct result of his bad relationship with his son. Due to his change of vote from guilty to not guilty, Juror 3 shows growth in character and is therefore considered dynamic.

Is Juror 11 an antagonist?

At another point in Act II, as there is a secret vote without Juror 8 and one man votes guilty, Juror 3 demands to know who has changed his vote. Juror 11 opposes his bullying of the others. THREE. Another juror who is antagonistic is Juror Ten.

Why did Juror 5 change his vote?

In Act II Juror 3 accused Juror 5 of changing his vote to not guilty after seeing his abrupt anger at Juror 10’s comments about how the slums are “… breeding grounds for criminals”. The other jurors do not seem to mind him very much.

Why did Juror 8 probably assume Juror 5 had seen knife fights in movies?

Why did juror 8 probably assume juror 5 had seen knife fights in movies? Because juror 8 has probably only seen knife fights in movies. Juror Eight explains that the people don’t have to prove the defendant didn’t commit the crime, but instead they have to prove the defendant did do the crime.

Why is Juror #4 so convinced that the woman’s testimony is so persuasive?

Why is FOUR convinced the woman’s testimony is so persuasive? The woman remembers insignificant details. Juror number four already believes the defendant is guilty.

How does Juror 11 reveal the value of immigration?

Juror 11 has a respect for the judicial system that is informed by his experience in his old country. He immigrated to America because he believes very deeply in the integrity of the system, even beyond the jurors born in the United States.

Which Juror grew up in the slums?

The main thing we know about Juror #5 is that he grew up in a slum—and he’s not especially fond of people who think everyone who comes out of a slum is a thief or a murderer.

Who were the cast of Twelve Angry Men?

12 Angry Men was remade for television in 1997. Directed by William Friedkin , the remake stars George C. Scott, James Gandolfini , Tony Danza , William Petersen , Ossie Davis , Hume Cronyn , Courtney B. Vance, Armin Mueller-Stahl, Mykelti Williamson , Edward James Olmos, Dorian Harewood , and Jack Lemmon .

What are the characteristics of an angry man?

An angry person usually expresses bitterness about life in general; ultimately he is expressing bitterness toward God. His hurts from the past are usually associated with many people or groups of people, and therefore it is hard for him to forgive a single individual or respond well if one asks him for forgiveness.

Who is the author of Twelve Angry Men?

Twelve Angry Men is a courtroom drama written by Reginald Rose concerning the jury of a homicide trial.