Is Steinbock right in claiming that there are morally relevant differences between human beings and nonhuman animals?

Is Steinbock right in claiming that there are morally relevant differences between human beings and nonhuman animals?

Steinbock argues that there are some morally relevant capacities that humans have but that all nonhuman animals lack. According to Steinbock, all animals’ suffering deserves moral consideration, but some species’ suffering deserves more consideration than others.

How does Steinbock respond to Singer’s point that some humans are less intelligent than some nonhuman animals?

How does Steinbock respond to Singer’s point that some humans are less intelligent than some nonhuman animals? By admitting that it is permissible to count those humans’ interests as less important than some nonhuman animals’ interests.

What does singer mean by saying that all animals are equal?

In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience.

What are two characteristic capacities that humans have that set them apart from animals according to Bonnie Steinbock?

Terms in this set (7) Uniquely human capacities – humans have them and nonhumans don’t. Moral responsibility: we are normally held morally responsible for what we do. Reciprocation (capacity for altruism): we can be motivated by moral reasons, “requires fairly abstract concepts”.

Do you think that nonhuman animals have interests does this mean that they also have rights explain?

since animals also have interests like human beings they should also have rights. non-human animals also have interests because the can feel joy and suffering, their lives can go ill or go well for them meaning they also have interests just like human beings.

What is the meaning of the term speciesism quizlet?

speciesism. a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species.