What was the significance of the Webster Hayne debate?
Hayne of South Carolina. It was motivated by a dispute over the continued sale of western lands, an important source of revenue for the federal government. While the debaters argued about slavery, the economy, protection tariffs, and western land, the real implication was the meaning of the United States Constitution.
What was the Webster Hayne debate quizlet?
The Webster-Hayne debate was between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina, 1830 regarding protectionist tariffs. Calhoun, was a proponent of protective tariffs; later, he was a proponent of free trade.
What is Webster’s main argument against nullification?
Southerners, in response to tariff laws that favored the North, supported the concept of “nullification.” Nullification held that states had the right to disobey laws of Congress they thought were unconstitutional. Webster argued that nullification would destroy the Union.
How did Jackson respond to the Webster Hayne debate?
Jackson’s Response: He said that being able to declare a law unjust gave the states a way to legally protest federal legislation. Even though Andrew Jackson was very strongly against nullification, he was worried about the economic condition of the southern states.
Where did the Webster Hayne debate happen?
South Carolina
Hayne of South Carolina that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of protectionist tariffs.
What are Nullifications?
Definition of nullification 1 : the act of nullifying : the state of being nullified. 2 : the action of a state impeding or attempting to prevent the operation and enforcement within its territory of a law of the U.S.
What was the Webster Hayne debate Apush?
An argument between Daniel Webster and Robert Hayne, about the issue states’ rights versus national power. Webster said that Hayne was a challenge to the integrity of the Union. Hayne responded with a defense of the theory of nullification.
What did Daniel Webster argue?
Maryland (1819) he contended that a state could not tax a federal agency (a branch of the Bank of the United States), for the power to tax was a “power to destroy.” In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) he argued that a state could not encroach upon the congressional power to regulate interstate commerce.
Did Jackson support Webster and Hayne?
In April, after Hayne defended states’ rights in the principal speech at the annual Jefferson Day dinner in Washington, President Jackson offered the first “volunteer” toast and echoed Webster’s nationalism: “Our Federal Union.
What was the Webster Hayne debate 1830?
In 1830, during a Senate debate on the sale of western lands, Hayne charged that senators from the industrial northeast sought to increase the power of the federal government at the expense of the states.