What is the opposite of eternalism?
In the philosophy of time, presentism is the belief that neither the future nor the past exists. The opposite of presentism is ‘eternalism’, which is a belief in things that are past and things that are yet to come exist eternally.
What does eternalism mean in Buddhism?
Sassatavada
Sassatavada (Pali) also śāśvata-dṛṣṭi (Sanskrit), usually translated “eternalism” is a kind of thinking rejected by the Buddha in the nikayas (and agamas). One example of it is the belief that the individual has an unchanging self. Views of this kind were held at the Buddha’s time by a variety of groups.
What is the block universe theory?
According to the block universe theory, the universe is a giant block of all the things that ever happen at any time and at any place. On this view, the past, present and future all exist — and are equally real.
Was Augustine a Presentist?
Augustine suggests so. In contemporary philosophy, we would call him a Presentist about time.
What is Presentist bias?
The presentist bias – in the sense of an undue focus on short-term interests (considerations or consequences) resulting in policy decisions that fail to maximize a society’s long-term welfare – is but one of these.
What is Annihilationism and eternalism?
The extremes are eternalism, the view that persons are eternal, and annihilationism, the view that persons go utterly out of existence (usually understood to mean at death, though a term still shorter than one lifetime is not ruled out).
What is the meaning of Eternalism?
Eternalism is a philosophical approach to the ontological nature of time, which takes the view that all existence in time is equally real, as opposed to presentism or the growing block universe theory of time, in which at least the future is not the same as any other time.
Is presentism a fallacy?
The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past. In this kind of approach, which emphasizes the relevance of history to the present, things that do not seem relevant receive little attention, which results in a misleading portrayal of the past.