What was the difference between presidential and congressional Reconstruction?
Presidential Reconstruction was the approach that promoted more leniency towards the South regarding plans for readmission to the Union. Congressional Reconstruction blamed the South and wanted retribution for causing the Civil War.
How did presidential Reconstruction differ from congressional Reconstruction quizlet?
How did Presidential Reconstruction differ from Congressional Reconstruction? Presidential Reconstruction was more limited in scope, while Congressional Reconstruction sought to transform the South into a racially integrated region where blacks had equal rights.
How different were the three plans for Reconstruction?
While all three plans required the former Confederate states to formally abolish slavery, Congressional Reconstruction required that the newly freed population have certain protections. They formed the Freedman’s Bureau to help integrate former slaves into the fabric of society.
What was Congressional Reconstruction?
Congressional Reconstruction was the period after the Civil War in which the federal government enacted and attempted to enforce equal suffrage on the ex-Confederate states. In Alabama, this period lasted from 1867 to the end of 1874 and was characterized by racial conflict and widespread terrorist activity.
What was a main difference between the Reconstruction plan outlined by Abraham Lincoln and the plan of radical Republicans?
Radical plan wanted to punish the south, while Lincoln and Johnson wanted to reunite the union as quickly as possible.
What is the difference between President Lincoln and President Johnson’s Reconstruction plans as opposed to the radical Republicans plan for Reconstruction?
Now that we understand the plans, let’s compare… Both Lincoln and Johnson’s plan wanted a quick re-admission for the South. Johnson’s plan wasn’t as willing to give as much freedom to newly free slaves as Lincolns was. Johnson’s plan gave less protection to freed slaves then the Radical Republican’s plan.
What was the fundamental difference between President Johnson and Congress during Reconstruction quizlet?
Johnson opposed the fourteenth amendment and wanted Republican lawmakers thrown out of office. Congress passed the military Reconstruction Act over Johnson’s veto. You just studied 13 terms!
Why was Lincoln’s plan for Reconstruction considered moderate when compared to the congressional plans?
Most moderate Republicans in Congress supported the president’s proposal for Reconstruction because they wanted to bring a swift end to the war, but other Republicans feared that the planter aristocracy would be restored and the blacks would be forced back into slavery.
What were the major differences of the reconstruction plans offered by Presidents Lincoln and Johnson and the Radical Republican Congressional plan?
Lincolns plan was more lenient. Lincoln would give amnesty to the southern states who 10% pledged an oath. The radical Republicans want to 50% to take an oath.
What were the major differences between Lincoln’s plan for reconstruction and Johnson’s plan for reconstruction?
What was the key difference between the Lincoln and Johnson plans for Reconstruction? Unlike Lincoln’s plan, Johnson’s plan barred from political participation any ex-Confederate with taxable property worth $20,000 or more. How did the Thirteenth Amendment change the Constitution? It abolished slavery.
How did Congress approach Reconstruction?
How did Congress approach Reconstruction after the Civil War? It wanted to penalize the South heavily for starting the war. They destroyed the South’s morale and captured its capital, forcing the South to surrender.
Why did Congress control Reconstruction?
In early 1866, Congressional Republicans, appalled by mass killing of ex-slaves and adoption of restrictive black codes, seized control of Reconstruction from President Johnson. The 14th Amendment also reduced representation in Congress of any southern state that deprived African Americans of the vote.