Why is CDDL incompatible with GPL?
CDDL is incompatible with GPL because GPL has similar conditions as CDDL. If we were to make an identical copy of the CDDL license and call it CDDLv2, those two identical twins would be incompatible with each other.
Is GPL license good?
SCO’s Chris Sontag argues there are many reasons that the GNU General Public License is bad for the software industry. The General Public License is not good for the software industry for a variety of reasons.
What is the difference between GPL and LGPL licenses?
GPL stands for General Public License. LGPL is like an amended version of GPL. It stands for Lesser General Public License. It limits your requirement to provide some of your code, but you still are required to divulge the modifications that you implement.
Is GPL license bad?
Many consider the GPL a “business-unfriendly” license because of its so-called viral nature: All software derived from GPL-licensed code must in turn be licensed under the GPL. If the GPL doesn’t work for you, you can purchase the software under an alternative commercial license.
Is CDDL license permissive?
Like the MPL, the CDDL is a weak copyleft license in-between GPL license and BSD/MIT permissive licenses, requiring only source code files under CDDL to remain under CDDL.
Is MIT license GPL compatible?
The MIT License is compatible with many copyleft licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL). Any software licensed under the terms of the MIT License can be integrated with software licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Why is GPL v3 bad?
GPLv3 enforces copyleft upon anyone who links to a GPLv3 application. There is a risk that simply including or using bash4+ could infect the system with GPLv3 compliance requirements, forcing Apple to publish their proprietary source code.
What are the advantages of GPL license software?
Advantages for users of GPL v3 software As a user of GPL v3 software, you have lots of freedom: You can use GPL software for commercial purposes. You can modify the software and create derivative work. You can distribute the software and any derivative work you produce, without having to ask for permission or pay …
What is meant by LGPL software licensed?
A Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a license for open-source software that allows for provisions for including elements of free software in either free or proprietary software.
What is meant by LGPL software licenses?
LGPL (GNU Lesser General Public License) is a free software license published by the Free Software Foundation. The LGPL provides a more permissive alternative for the strictly copyleft GPL.
Is CDDL compatible with Apache?
In addition to that, both Apache 2.0 and BSD are considered compatible with the GNU GPL, unlike CDDL. However, the CDDL is compatible with both the Apache and the BSD licenses.
Is the CDDL the same as the GPL?
While the Free Software Foundation (FSF) also considered the CDDL a free software license, they saw some incompatibilities with their GNU General Public License (GPL). The question of whether and when both licenses are incompatible sparked debates in the free software domain in 2004 to 2006.
Which is a weak copyleft license like the GPL?
Derived from the Mozilla Public License 1.1, the CDDL tries to address some of the problems of the MPL. Like the MPL, the CDDL is a weak copyleft license in-between GPL license and BSD / MIT permissive licenses, requiring only source code files under CDDL to remain under CDDL.
Is the common development and Distribution License ( CDDL ) free?
The Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) is a free and open-source software license, produced by Sun Microsystems, based on the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Files licensed under the CDDL can be combined with files licensed under other licenses, whether open source or proprietary.
What’s the difference between Mozilla MPL and CDDL?
The CDDL is based on the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 1.1, but it has made few changes to make it more accessible to developers, and the MPL version 2.0 was also significantly modified. The two main differences between the two licenses are GPL compatibility and simplicity: