Was stirner an ethical egoist?
Stirner wants to “abolish not only the state but also society as an institution responsible for its members”. He advocated egoism and a form of amoralism in which individuals would unite in a “Union of egoists” only when it was in their self-interest to do so.
What is egoism stirner?
Stirner’s philosophy is usually called “egoism”. He says that the egoist rejects pursuit of devotion to “a great idea, a good cause, a doctrine, a system, a lofty calling”, saying that the egoist has no political calling, but rather “lives themselves out” without regard to “how well or ill humanity may fare thereby”.
Was stirner a psychological egoist?
Egoism. Stirner has been broadly understood as a proponent of both psychological egoism and ethical egoism, although the latter position can be disputed, as there is no claim in Stirner’s writing, in which one ‘ought to’ pursue one’s own interest, and further claiming any ‘ought’ could be seen as a new ‘fixed idea’.
Was stirner a moral nihilist?
Stirner belonged to movements which Marx rejected as ‘intel- lectual nihilists’. Following the nihilist logic to its ultimate implic- ations, he denied God and Christian values, the State’s authority, and all traditional morality.
Was Stirner real?
Max Stirner, pseudonym of Johann Kaspar Schmidt, (born October 25, 1806, Bayreuth, Bavaria [Germany]—died June 26, 1856, Berlin, Prussia), German antistatist philosopher in whose writings many anarchists of the late 19th and the 20th centuries found ideological inspiration.
Who did Stirner influence?
By the turn of the century, the belief that Nietzsche had been influenced by Stirner was so widespread that it became something of a commonplace at least in Germany, prompting one observer to note in 1907 that “Stirner’s influence in modern Germany has assumed astonishing proportions, and moves in general parallel with …
Is stirner real?
Johann Kaspar Schmidt (25 October 1806 – 26 June 1856), known professionally as Max Stirner, was a German post-Hegelian philosopher, dealing mainly with the Hegelian notion of social alienation and self-consciousness….
| Max Stirner | |
|---|---|
| Died | 26 June 1856 (aged 49) Berlin, Prussia, German Confederation |
When was Max Stirner born?
October 25, 1806
Max Stirner/Date of birth
Max Stirner, pseudonym of Johann Kaspar Schmidt, (born October 25, 1806, Bayreuth, Bavaria [Germany]—died June 26, 1856, Berlin, Prussia), German antistatist philosopher in whose writings many anarchists of the late 19th and the 20th centuries found ideological inspiration.
What is Max Stirner’s opinion on the nature of people?
For Stirner, the essential core of human nature is the self-interested ego so each person should be able to express their individuality free from all constraints. Consequently, the self-interested and rational individual should be able to use anything or anyone they want to achieve their own purposes.
Did Engels own a factory?
The wealthy Engels family owned large cotton-textile mills in Barmen and Salford, both expanding industrial metropoles.
Where is Max Stirner buried?
Cimetière Sophien II, Berlin, Germany
Max Stirner/Place of burial
Was stirner real?
What kind of philosophy is Stirner’s egoism?
Stirner’s philosophy is usually called “egoism”. He says that the egoist rejects pursuit of devotion to “a great idea, a good cause, a doctrine, a system, a lofty calling”, saying that the egoist has no political calling, but rather “lives themselves out” without regard to “how well or ill humanity may fare thereby”.
What kind of philosophy does Max Stirner believe in?
Stirner has been broadly understood as a proponent of both psychological egoism and ethical egoism, although the latter position can be disputed as there is no claim in Stirner’s writing in which one ought to pursue one’s own interest and further claiming any “ought” could be seen as a new “fixed idea”.
What was the result of Stirner’s view of life?
The result is enslavement to moralities, ideologies and religions, a condition that neuters the experience of life and subordinates the true interests of the individual. Stirner’s view of selfishness and self‐fulfillment stands in sharp contrast to that of Ayn Rand.
How does Stirner’s view differ from Ayn Rand’s?
Stirner’s view of selfishness and self‐fulfillment stands in sharp contrast to that of Ayn Rand. Where Stirner vindicates the unbridled fulfillment of the unique individual without regard to, for instance, external morality, the rigidity of Rand’s positions reveals the kinds of “fixed ideas” Stirner excoriated.