What is a poisoning the well fallacy?
Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a type of informal fallacy where adverse information about a target is preemptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing something that the target person is about to say.
What is the difference between ad hominem abusive and ad hominem circumstantial?
Types of Ad Hominem Fallacy Abusive – This is where the person is directly attacked. (i.e. This is why a woman shouldn’t do a man’s job.) Circumstantial – Personal circumstances motivate a person’s argument, so it must be false.
Which ad hominem is considered an ad hominem in advance?
Ad Hominem in advance; is when someone leads you to reject a claim by poisoning your view of the person making the claim. is when we reject a claim because of its origin or history; often considered a blanket fallacy that includes ad hominem; the target is a club, a political party, an industrial group.
Where is poison the well from?
Coral Springs, FL
Poison the Well/Origin
Where does the phrase poison the well come from?
The origin of the phrase comes from the belief in medieval times that outbreaks of bubonic plague were caused by Jews poisoning the water supply. Suggesting that someone was not to be trusted after accusing them of the unrelated crime of poisoning the water was effective rhetoric, but bad logic.
How is poisoning the well different from poisoning the discussion?
Poisoning the well is not necessarily personal. For example, beginning a discussion by saying “It’s stupid to talk about this at all, but…” poisons the discussion by rendering trivial what might be important to other participants. Poisoning the well is presumptive rather than disruptive.
When is a personal attack an ad hominem argument?
However, a personal attack is a claim, not a fallacy. Thus, a character or a circumstantial attack simpliciter is not evaluated as an ad hominem argument or an ad hominem fallacy. Person L proffers claim p. Person L ‘s circumstances or character is unsatisfactory or L does not act in accordance with p. Claim p is implausible or unlikely.
When is poisoning the well a logical fallacy?
Updated February 14, 2019. Poisoning the well is a logical fallacy (a type of ad hominem argument) in which a person attempts to place an opponent in a position from which he or she is unable to reply.
What are the different types of ad hominem?
Some Varieties of Ad Hominem: Ad Personam, Ad Feminam, Tu Quoque, Two Wrongs Fallacy, Ex Concessis, and Ex Aliquem Although there is no generally accepted consensus, many logicians today distinguish several prevailing indistinct varieties of fallacies related to the argumentum ad hominem fallacy: