Where is Jan Schlichtmann now?
Jan Schlichtmann Joins ClassAction.com as Of Counsel Attorney.
What type of attorney is Jan Schlichtmann?
environmental lawyers
Boston Class Action Lawyer Jan Schlichtmann is one of America’s foremost environmental lawyers, specializing in toxic torts and consumer protection. He graduated from University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 1973 before attaining his JD at Cornell University in 1977.
Who is Jerome facher?
Jerome Facher, a Boston lawyer who successfully defended a tannery accused of water pollution that plaintiffs linked to a cluster of childhood leukemia deaths — a case that became the basis of a best-selling book and a Hollywood movie — died on Sept. 19 at his home in Arlington, Mass. He was 93.
Is the movie a civil action a true story?
‘A Civil Action’ is based on a true story of a court case about environmental pollution that took place in Woburn, Massachusetts in the 1970s. It was a tragic time, for the people who lost their loved ones.
Does Schlichtmann regret having taken the Woburn case?
(His wife still refuses to go to the annual Woburn gatherings for this reason.) Schlichtmann fell behind on his mortgage and started living in the office. But none of the partners regretted the case.
What happened with the Woburn case?
In May of 1979 a major story broke in Woburn. Several barrels of chemicals had been found dumped near the Aberjona River. When state investigators tested Wells G and H, they found that they were contaminated with TCE (tetrachloroethylene — a suspected carcinogen) and other industrial byproducts.
When Mr Schlichtmann went to the tannery What did he see that caused him to accept the case?
2. When Mr. Schlichtmann went to the tannery, what did he see that caused him to accept the case? He saw the company discarding waste, and he also saw wealthy companies that he could sue.
How does Jerome facher prevent the witnesses from testifying against his client Beatrice Foods?
He devised a maneuver to keep the victims’ families from testifying by focusing the first phase of the trial on a scientific question: whether any of the poisons had actually migrated from the tannery to city wells. He underscored the fact that the 15-acre tannery site was separated from the city wells by a river.
What made Schlichtmann decide to take the Woburn case instead of dropping it like originally planned?
Schlichtmann originally decides not to take the case due to both the lack of evidence and a clear defendant. Later picking up the case, Schlichtmann finds evidence suggesting trichloroethylene (TCE) contamination of the town’s water supply by Riley Tannery, a subsidiary of Beatrice Foods; a chemical company, W. R.
How much money did Mr schlichtmann want to settle the case?
Grace chemical company, however, was guilty. But with little money and almost no chance of success in a second phase of the trial, Schlichtmann’s firm settled with W. R. Grace for $8 million. This infuriated lead plaintiff Anne Anderson, who had just wanted an apology.
What happened in the Woburn case?
Does schlichtmann regret having taken the Woburn case?
Is the jury still out on Jan Schlichtmann?
The jury’s still out. The hearing is not going well for Jan Schlichtmann. He’s back in Woburn, the town that scarred him, drove him to madness, altered him forever, and then, still later, made him famous.
Who is Jan Schlichtmann suing in Massachusetts Turnpike case?
In this case, that party is the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which Schlichtmann sued this spring. He contends that the Turnpike Authority is unfairly burdening commuters who travel into Boston on I-90, and through the Sumner and Ted Williams tunnels.
What happens if Jan Schlichtmann wins Big Dig case?
If he wins or, more probably, settles to his liking, the case will rewrite not only legislation in Massachusetts—which in 1997 passed the law that set up the Big Dig repayment plan—but also legislation throughout the country.
What kind of tax lien did Jan Schlichtmann have?
Of course, it’s worth noting that Schlichtmann’s evangelism for settling cases quickly grew in its fervor at the same time that he needed money. According to public records, until 2003 he had numerous liens against him: property tax, state and federal income taxes.