What was the main issue in the Tyson Foods v Bouaphakeo case?
Tyson Foods argued that the class should not be certified because of the individual variance in the employees’ protective gear. The district court held that there were sufficiently-common questions to certify the class, such as whether the donning and doffing qualified as work under the FLSA.
What was the US Supreme Court’s holding in the case in the text Tyson Foods Incorporated v Bouaphakeo?
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the opinion for the 6-2 majority, which held that the class members were joined under one common question, and that satisfies the requirements for a class action suit despite differences among the members.
What Rule or Law did the Court apply in the Tyson Foods v bouaphakeo case?
Bouaphakeo et al. filed suit, alleging that the donning and doffing were integral and indispensable to their hazardous work and that petitioner’s policy not to pay for those activities denied them overtime compensation required by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA).
What was the Court’s analysis of legal reasoning in the Tyson Foods v bouaphakeo case?
the Supreme Court held that statistical evidence was admissible to prove liability and damages across a class, thereby allowing it to support class action certification.
What was the court’s holding in the case in the text Tyson Foods Inc v Bouaphakeo quizlet?
What was the Court’s holding in the case in the text Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo? The granting of class certification was proper because the class members worked in the same facility, did similar work, and were paid under the same policy.
What was the court’s analysis of legal reasoning in O’Connor v Oakhurst Dairy?
What was the court’s CONCLUSION in O’Connor v Oakhurst Dairy? The court concluded that under Maine law the “F” exemption did not apply to the drivers, who were owed overtime hourly wages.
What is the main argument for avoiding a statute’s plain meaning or legislative history and instead following a prior interpretation in a case?
Promoting stability and certainty (Courts sometimes follow prior cases and administrative decisions interpreting a statute, regardless of the statute’s plain meaning or legislative history. The main argument for following these prior interpretations is to promote stability and certainty.)
What is the difference between administrative regulations and statutes quizlet?
Statutes are laws adopted by state or federal legislators. Ordinances are laws adopted by local legislators. Regulations are laws adopted by administrative agencies.
Who is the final authority to interpret the Constitution?
Supreme Court is the final authority to interpret the constitution of India.
What are presumptions in statutory interpretation?
In the interpretation of statutes, certain so-called presumptions exist, which are not truly concerned with evidence at all, but are cannons of interpretation. Thus presumption means an act of presuming, assuming or imagining something to be true.
Who passed statutory law?
Statutory laws are based on the statutes enacted and imposed by the legislature. A statute is a formal act of the Legislature in written form. It declares the will of the Legislature.
Is Statutory a law?
A statute law is a written law produced by Parliament which originates from decisions made in other courts and the country’s written constitution. The words of these rules are used by the judge whereby their exact meaning is put across to the court.
What was the Supreme Court decision in Tyson Foods v Bouaphakeo?
The case arose as a class action lawsuit against Tyson Foods. The Supreme Court affirmed the Eighth Circuit’s judgment that the class satisfied the predominance requirement of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ‘s Rule 23 and that the use of representative evidence was allowable in this case.
What was the case that Tyson Foods was sued for?
Employees brought suit in federal district court against Tyson Foods for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law. The employees worked in an Iowa pork processing plant in the cut and retrim and kill departments.
Why did the district court not certify Tyson Foods class?
Tyson Foods argued that the class should not be certified because of the individual variance in the employees’ protective gear. The district court held that there were sufficiently-common questions to certify the class, such as whether the donning and doffing qualified as work under the FLSA.