What was discussed at the Putney Debates?
The debates that began at St Mary’s church on 28 October 1647 pioneered the liberal, democratic settlement: a written constitution, universal suffrage, freedom of conscience and equality before the law.
Why did the Putney Debates end?
The debates were not reported and Clarke’s minutes were not published at the time. They were lost until 1890 when they were rediscovered at the library of Worcester College, Oxford, and subsequently published as part of the Clarke Papers. — Putney Debates record book 1647, Worcester College, Oxford, MS 65.
When was the heads of proposals?
1647
Heads of the Proposals (1647)
Who was the leader of the levelers?
John Lilburne – Leveller leader. .
Where did the Putney Debates take place in 1647?
The Putney Debates were a series of discussions between factions of the New Model Army and the Levellers concerning a new constitution for England. The debates were held at the Church of St Mary the Virgin, Putney, Surrey, in October and November 1647.
What did the Levellers do in the Putney Debates?
The Levellers criticised Ireton in particular for servility in his negotiations with the King and Parliament, and accused the Grandees of betraying the interests of the common soldiers and people of England. In October 1647, five of the most radical cavalry regiments elected new Agitators —known as the “New Agents”—to represent their views.
Who was the most radical officer in the Putney Debates?
Thomas Rainsborough, the most radical of the officers, argued: “I desire that those that had engaged in it should speak, for really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he; and therefore truly.
What did the new agents do in the Putney Debates?
In October 1647, five of the most radical cavalry regiments elected new Agitators —known as the “New Agents”—to represent their views. The New Agents issued a political manifesto: The Case of the Armie Truly Stated, and endorsed the constitutional proposals drafted by civilian Levellers in the Agreement of the People.