What happened in the rv Sharpe case?
The case concerned two interests, the right to freedom of expression which is fundamental in a democratic society and the child’s right to protection from harm. The Court found that the law prohibiting possession of child pornography interfered with the right to freedom of expression.
Why was the Oakes test created?
The Court in R v Oakes created a two-step balancing test to determine whether a government can justify a law which limits a Charter right.
Who won RV Oakes?
Court’s reasons. The Court was unanimous in holding that the shift in onus violated both Oakes’ section 11(d) rights and indirectly his section 7 rights, and could not be justified under section 1 of the Charter.
What are the 4 parts of the Oakes test?
Oakes test
- There must be a pressing and substantial objective.
- The means must be proportional. The means must be rationally connected to the objective. There must be minimal impairment of rights. There must be proportionality between the infringement and objective.
Should there ever be limits to Charter rights?
Section 1 states that in order for a Charter right to be lawfully limited, the limit must be “demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.”i This basically means that limiting someone’s Charter rights must be reasonable in that it must seek to address an issue of pressing or substantial concern, done in a …
Did Oakes get charged?
Oakes was accused of possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking. Oakes Case 1986, in which David E. Oakes was accused of possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking….Oakes Case.
| Published Online | February 7, 2006 |
|---|---|
| Last Edited | February 13, 2015 |
Can your constitutional rights be taken away?
The U.S. Constitution outlines the basic rights of all citizens of the United States. Each state’s constitution also outlines rights for its citizens. The state constitutions can add rights, but they can’t take away any U.S. Constitutional rights.
Why did RV Oakes argue that his Charter rights were violated?
Oakes’ position was that the reverse onus in section 8 of the Narcotics Control Act violated the presumption of innocence contained in section 11(d) of the new Charter. It unanimously held that the shift in onus violated Oakes’ section 11(d) right to presumption of innocence.
Do you think there should ever be limits to Charter rights?
Can the government take away or limit my charter rights?
When and how the government can put limits on your rights The Charter recognizes that even in a democracy, rights and freedoms are not absolute. Section 1 of the Charter allows the government to put limits on rights and freedoms if that limit: is set out in law.